Cold War prestige — The U.S. government considered it vital that the U.S. win the space race
against the Soviet Union. Going to the Moon was risky and expensive (John F. Kennedy famously said that the U.S. chose to go because it was hard).
Despite close monitoring by the Soviet Union, Bill Kaysing maintains
that it would have been easier for the U.S. to fake it, and consequently guarantee success, than
for the U.S. actually to go.
Money — NASA raised approximately $30 billion to go to the Moon. Bill Kaysing claims that this
amount could have been used to pay off a large number of people, providing significant motivation
for complicity .
Risk — This argument assumes that the problems early in the space program were insurmountable, even by a technology team fully motivated and funded to fix the problems. Kaysing claimed that the chance of a successful landing on the moon was calculated to be 0.017%.
Distraction — According to hoax proponents, the U.S. government benefited from a popular
distraction from the Vietnam war. Lunar activities suddenly stopped, with planned missions
cancelled, around the same time that the U.S. ceased its involvement in the Vietnam War.
(However, the Apollo program was cancelled several years before the Vietnam War ended.
Delivering the promise — To seemingly fulfill President Kennedy's 1961 promise "to achieving
the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to
the Earth."
Here the cheap studio before they took the landing:
Photo of the high-quality SSTV image before the scan conversion
And here how it looked later:
See here how Rammstein imagines the moon landing:
4 comments:
Maybe we all will go to the moon??
it is so easy..:)
I'm sorry. Are you TRYING to look stupid?
You are stupid..read the article carefully..
till 1972 it was easy and later what??
they forgot how do it??
and dont tell me that the government reduced the money for NASA..
PROPAGANDA - do u know this word?
Another Unfounded lie!!!!!!
Post a Comment